BIBP Platform Effectiveness Survey

Purpose: This survey collects data to evaluate how the Blockchain-enabled IoT-BIM Platform (BIBP) has affected the volume of communications required for carbon data management in the MiC student hostel project. Your responses will be used in research publication. Estimated completion time: 8–12 minutes. All responses are anonymous.
Section A: Respondent Profile
*
A1. Which of the following best describes your current role?
Project Manager
BIM Coordinator
Carbon Data Officer / Manager
Site Supervisor
Design / MEP Engineer
Compliance / Audit Liaison
Academic researcher / faculty member
Postdoctoral researcher / research fellow
Doctoral or master’s student / research assistant
Other:
*
A2. How many years of experience do you have in fields related to construction, carbon management, digitalization, or sustainability?
Less than 1 year
1 to 3 years
4 to 6 years
7 to 10 years
More than 10 years
*
A3. What is your level of involvement with the BIBP platform or the MiC project examined in this study?
Directly involved in platform use or project implementation
Involved in project management, coordination, or decision making
Involved in research, evaluation, or technical support
Familiar with the project but not directly involved
Not directly involved
*
A4. In which field is your professional experience primarily based in relation to this study?[Choose at least 1 item]
Construction project management
BIM / digital construction
Carbon accounting / carbon data management
Sustainability / environmental management
Structural, architectural, or MEP design
Site construction / contractor operations
Compliance, auditing, or regulatory affairs
Academic research related to construction, sustainability, or digitalization
Other:
*
A5. Before BIBP was implemented, which system(s) did you use to manage carbon data? (Select all that apply)[Choose at least 1 item]
Spreadsheets (Excel / Google Sheets)
Commercial BIM software (without carbon module)
IoT or sensor-based monitoring systems
Paper records
Other:
Section B: Data Collection-Related Communications
The following questions ask about communications you initiated or received specifically to collect raw carbon data — for example, requesting material quantities from contractors, asking suppliers for emission factor certificates, or following up on site measurement data. Please do NOT include automatic platform notifications or general project coordination messages.
*
B1. (Before BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week did you send or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
0
1–3
4–6
7–10
11–15
More than 15
*
B2. (Before BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week did you make or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
0
1–3
4–6
7–10
11–15
More than 15
*
B3. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week do you send or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
0
1–3
4-6
7-10
11-15
More than 15
*
B4. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week do you make or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
0
1–3
4–6
7–10
11–15
More than 15
*
B5. Which platform features have most reduced your data collection communications? (Select all that apply)[Choose at least 1 item]
Automated IoT data capture (reduces need to request field measurements)
Real-time carbon monitoring dashboard (reduces follow-up queries)
Supplier / contractor self-upload portal
Blockchain-verified emission factor database
Other:
Reduction has not been noticeable
B6. (Optional) What types of data collection communications still remain, and why?
Section C: Carbon Data Compliance-Related Communications
The following questions ask about communications related to verifying the accuracy or compliance of carbon data — for example, responding to auditor queries, resolving discrepancies between platform records and physical measurements, or preparing documentation for regulatory reporting. Please do NOT include initial data collection requests (covered in Section B).
*
C1. (Before BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week did you send or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
0
1–3
4–6
7–10
11–15
More than 15
*
C2. (Before BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week did you make or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
0
1–3
4–6
7–10
11–15
More than 15
*
C3. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week do you send or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
0
1–3
4-6
7-10
11-15
More than 15
*
C4. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week do you make or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
0
1–3
4–6
7–10
11–15
More than 15
*
C5. Which platform features have most reduced your compliance-related communications? (Select all that apply)[Choose at least 1 item]
Blockchain immutability (reduces disputes about data authenticity)
Automated smart contract verification
Full audit trail and traceability records
IFC-compatible data export for regulatory submission
Other:
Reduction has not been noticeable
C6. (Optional) What types of compliance communications still remain, and why?
Section D: Overall Perception
Please rate your level of agreement with each statement below.
*
D1. BIBP has reduced my need to contact others to obtain carbon data.
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Aggree
*
D2. Since using BIBP, I encounter fewer disputes about the accuracy of carbon data.
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Aggree
*
D3. The blockchain audit trail reduces the number of follow-up queries from auditors or regulators.
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Aggree
*
D4. Overall, BIBP has noticeably reduced the communication workload associated with carbon data management.
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Aggree
Powered By www.wjx.cn
Report