Scan qrcode
00:00:00
Debate 4 Scoring Sheet-L1L2L3
录音中...
*
Please first click the following "Affirmative team" option and start scoring for the affirmative team.
Affirmative team
*
1. Organization and Clarity: Viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly.
Unclear in most parts
Clear in some parts but not over all
Mostly clear and orderly in all parts
Completely clear and orderly presentation
*
2. Use of Arguments: Reasons are given to support viewpoint.
Few or no relevant reasons given
Some relevant reasons given
Many reasons given: fairly relevant
Most relevant reasons given in support
*
3. Use of Examples and Facts: Examples and facts are given to support reasons, with references
Few or no relevant supporting examples/facts
Some relevant examples/facts given
Many examples/facts given: fairly relevant
Most relevant supporting examples and facts given
*
4. Use of Rebuttal: Arguments made by the other teams are responded to and dealt
with effectively.
No effective counterarguments made
Few effective counterarguments made
Some effective counterarguments made
Many effective counterarguments made
*
5. Presentation Style: Tone of voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are convincing to audience.
Few style features were used; not convincingly
Few style features were used but they were used convincingly
All style features were used, most convincingly
All style features were used convincingly
*
Now please click the following "Negative team" option and start scoring for the negative team.
Negative team
*
1. Organization and Clarity: Viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly.
Unclear in most parts
Clear in some parts but not over all
Mostly clear and orderly in all parts
Completely clear and orderly presentation
*
2. Use of Arguments: Reasons are given to support viewpoint.
Few or no relevant reasons given
Some relevant reasons given
Many reasons given: fairly relevant
Most relevant reasons given in support
*
3. Use of Examples and Facts: Examples and facts are given to support reasons, with references
Few or no relevant supporting examples/facts
Some relevant examples/facts given
Many examples/facts given: fairly relevant
Most relevant supporting examples and facts given
*
4. Use of Rebuttal: Arguments made by the other teams are responded to and dealt
with effectively.
No effective counterarguments made
Few effective counterarguments made
Some effective counterarguments made
Many effective counterarguments made
*
5. Presentation Style:Tone of voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are convincing to audience.
Few style features were used; not convincingly
Few style features were used but they were used convincingly
All style features were used, most convincingly
All style features were used convincingly
*
Name of the evaluator ( your registered name in SIS)
*
Student ID of the evaluator
Evaluation object score
字体大小
Debate 4 Scoring Sheet-L1L2L3
复制
