AIAC Presentation Evaluation Form (George Andriopoulos)

Candidate Name: George Andriopoulos

TEACHING DEMO

Please provide comments for each criterion below.

1.

Content Clarity and Organisation

- Was the content well-structured and easy to follow?

- Did the candidate present the material in a logical sequence? 

2.

Subject Knowledge

- Did the candidate demonstrate a strong understanding of the topic?

- Were they able to answer questions appropriately? 

3.

Engagement and Communication

- Did the candidate engage the audience effectively?

- Were explanations clear and understandable? 

4.

Use of Teaching Aids (Slides, Visuals, etc.)

- Were teaching aids (e.g., slides, whiteboard) used effectively?

- Did they enhance understanding of the material? 

5.

Overall Effectiveness of Teaching Demo

- Was the candidate effectively delivering the content in a short time frame? 

6.

Impact

- Level of empathy with the audience

- Positive attitude towards the audience 

7.

General Comments (if any)

8. Please rate each criterion below from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent).
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Content Clarity and Organisation  
Subject Knowledge 
Engagement and Communication 
Use of Teaching Aids (Slides, Visuals, etc.) 
Overall Effectiveness of Teaching Demo 
Impact of Teaching Demo

RESEARCH SEMINAR

Please provide comments for each criterion below. 

9.

Research Quality and Relevance

- Was the research topic relevant and well-suited for the school’s goals?

- Did the candidate demonstrate a firm grasp of current trends? 

10.

Originality and Innovation

- Was the research presented original and innovative?

- Did the candidate contribute new ideas or methods? 

11.

Presentation Skills

- Did the candidate explain the research methodology and findings effectively?

- Was the presentation well-organized and easy to follow? 

12.

Impact and Applicability of Research

- Does the research have the potential for practical applications or real-world impact?

- Is the work likely to contribute to advancements in the field or to solve significant problems? 

- How well did the candidate articulate the significance of their research to industry, society, or academia? 

13.

Overall Effectiveness of Research Seminar

- Did the candidate make a strong case for their research and its impact? 

14.

General Comments (if any)

15. Please rate each criterion below from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent).
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Research Quality and Relevance 
Originality and Innovation 
Presentation Skills 
Impact and Applicability of Research 
Overall Effectiveness of Research Seminar 
16.

Based on the teaching and research demos, would you recommend this candidate for the school?

更多问卷 复制此问卷