Dear Participant,
Thank you for taking part in this survey. The purpose of this survey is to explore the diversity of diagnostic conclusions and treatment strategies for a standardized case. For this scenario, we have compiled 12 distinct diagnoses and their corresponding Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) treatment plans and prescriptions from multiple sources. We invite participants to evaluate each diagnosis and treatment plan based on their own professional experience. At the end of the questionnaire, if you find the provided options insufficient or inaccurate, you are welcome to offer your own assessment (this step is optional). Thank you for participating in this survey.
This questionnaire consists of two main sections: evaluation criteria and scoring methodology.
The evaluation covers the following five dimensions:
1. Accuracy of Western medicine diagnosis
2. Accuracy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) diagnosis
3. Appropriateness of TCM treatment principle
4. Appropriateness of TCM herbal prescription
5. Appropriateness of preventive care
Please rate the performance of the models in each dimension based on your professional knowledge or personal experience.
A five-point Likert scale is used for scoring, defined as follows:
1 point: Completely inaccurate, irrelevant, and/or inappropriate
2 points: Mostly inaccurate, irrelevant, and/or inappropriate
3 points: Partially accurate, relevant, and/or appropriate
4 points: Mostly accurate, relevant, and/or appropriate
5 points: Completely accurate, highly relevant, and/or highly appropriate
Completing the questionnaire is expected to take approximately 15–20 minutes. Your honest feedback will provide critical insights for this research and support the advancement of TCM-based healthcare.
If you have any questions regarding this study or the questionnaire, please feel free to contact me: Will Yan (kyan2@mgh.harvard.edu). We sincerely appreciate your participation and valuable input, which will have an important impact on the future development of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
中文翻译
尊敬的参与者:
感谢您参与本次调查!本调查的目的是探讨针对标准化案例的诊断结论和治疗策略的多样性。针对这一案例,我们从多个来源整理了12种不同的诊断和相应的中医治疗方案及处方。我们希望参与者根据自身的专业经验,对每个诊断和治疗方案进行评估。在问卷的最后,如果您认为提供的选项不足或不准确,您也可以选择提供您自己的评估意见(此步骤为可选项)。感谢您参与本次问卷调查!
本问卷包括两个主要部分:评估标准和评分方法。
评估内容主要包括以下五个维度:
1. 西医诊断的准确性
2. 中医诊断的准确性
3. 中医治疗原则的适宜性
4. 中药处方的适宜性
5. 预防调护的适宜性
请根据您的专业知识或个人经验,对模型在每个维度的表现进行评分。
评分采用5分制李克特量表,具体定义如下:
1分:完全不准确、不相关和/或不适宜
2分:大多不准确、不相关和/或不适宜
3分:部分准确、相关和/或适宜
4分:大多准确、相关和/或适宜
5分:完全准确、高度相关和/或非常适宜
完成问卷预计需要15-20分钟。您的诚实反馈将为本研究提供关键洞见,并助力中医药医疗的进步。
如果您对本研究或问卷内容有任何疑问,请随时联系我:Will Yan (kyan2@mgh.harvard.edu)。我们非常感谢您的参与和宝贵意见,这将为中医药的未来发展产生重要影响!