Debate 4 Scoring Sheet-L1L2L3

Please first click the following "Affirmative team" option and start scoring for the affirmative team.

Affirmative team

1. Organization and Clarity: Viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly.

Unclear in most partsClear in some parts but not over allMostly clear and orderly in all partsCompletely clear and orderly presentation

2. Use of Arguments: Reasons are given to support viewpoint.

Few or no relevant reasons givenSome relevant reasons givenMany reasons given: fairly relevantMost relevant reasons given in support

3. Use of Examples and Facts: Examples and facts are given to support reasons, with references

Few or no relevant supporting examples/factsSome relevant examples/facts givenMany examples/facts given: fairly relevantMost relevant supporting examples and facts given

4. Use of Rebuttal: Arguments made by the other teams are responded to and dealt
with effectively.

No effective counterarguments madeFew effective counterarguments madeSome effective counterarguments madeMany effective counterarguments made

5. Presentation Style: Tone of voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are convincing to audience.

Few style features were used; not convincinglyFew style features were used but they were used convincinglyAll style features were used, most convincinglyAll style features were used convincingly

Now please click the following "Negative team" option and start scoring for the negative team.

Negative team

1. Organization and Clarity: Viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly.

Unclear in most partsClear in some parts but not over allMostly clear and orderly in all partsCompletely clear and orderly presentation

2. Use of Arguments: Reasons are given to support viewpoint.

Few or no relevant reasons givenSome relevant reasons givenMany reasons given: fairly relevantMost relevant reasons given in support

3. Use of Examples and Facts: Examples and facts are given to support reasons, with references

Few or no relevant supporting examples/factsSome relevant examples/facts givenMany examples/facts given: fairly relevantMost relevant supporting examples and facts given

4. Use of Rebuttal: Arguments made by the other teams are responded to and dealt

with effectively.

No effective counterarguments madeFew effective counterarguments madeSome effective counterarguments madeMany effective counterarguments made

5. Presentation Style:Tone of voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are convincing to audience.

Few style features were used; not convincinglyFew style features were used but they were used convincinglyAll style features were used, most convincinglyAll style features were used convincingly

Name of the evaluator ( your registered name in SIS)

Student ID of the evaluator

更多问卷复制此问卷