28. 您主要关注、研究或从事的行业最契合欧盟《NIS2 指令》中的哪一类? / Which category of the EU 'NIS2 Directive' does the industry you primarily focus on, research, or work in fit best? A.能源(含风光储、传统电力) / A. Energy (including wind, solar, storage, and traditional power) B.电信(固网、接入网、核心网、物联网等) / B. Telecommunications (fixed network, access network, core network, IoT, etc.) C.银行、金融市场基础设施、数字提供商、数字基础设施与云服务 / C. Banking, financial market infrastructures, digital providers, digital infrastructure, and cloud services D.化学品、食品、制造业、废物管理、交通、邮政与快递 / D. Chemicals, food, manufacturing, waste management, transport, postal and courier services E.水务、废水、航天、公共管理 / E. Drinking water, waste water, space, public administration F.健康、研究 / F. Health, research G.其他:________ / G. Others: ________
29. 您是否认可欧盟CSA2法案中,以非技术原因排除高性价比的中国供应商 / Do you approve of the EU CSA2 Act excluding highly cost-effective Chinese suppliers for non-technical reasons? 完全不认可 / Completely disapprove 不认可 / Disapprove 中立 / Neutral 认可 / Approve 非常认可 / Strongly approve
30. 若相关高技术企业因法案退出,您认为对欧盟本地就业的影响是? / If relevant high-tech enterprises exit due to the act, what do you think the impact will be on local employment in the EU? 毫无影响(本土企业能完全吸纳劳动力) / No impact at all (local enterprises can fully absorb the labor force) 结构性失业(需大规模政府救助与转岗培训) / Structural unemployment (requires large-scale government relief and job transition training) 核心人才流失(导致欧洲该领域研发活力长期低迷丧失) / Loss of core talent (leading to a long-term slump and loss of R&D vitality in this field in Europe)
31. 您认为最终由终端消费者承担的成本转嫁程度? / What do you think is the degree of cost pass-through ultimately borne by end consumers (e.g., higher electricity and internet bills)? 商家消化(不涨价) / Absorbed by businesses (no price increase) 轻微上涨(<20%) / Slight increase (<20%) 显著上涨(>20%,20%, <50%, directly increasing people's living burdens) 巨幅上涨(>50%, 显著影响民众可支配收入) / Massive increase (>50%, significantly affecting people's disposable income) 其他_____ / Others _____
32. 您认为受影响行业的供应中断,对欧洲其他经济部门的连锁冲击倍数大约是? / What do you think is the approximate multiplier of the cascading impact on other European economic sectors caused by supply disruptions in affected industries? 1 - 2 倍(局部影响,可迅速恢复) / 1 - 2 times (Localized impact, can quickly recover) 3 - 5 倍(显著传导,导致多行业生产效率下降) / 3 - 5 times (Significant transmission, leading to a decline in production efficiency across multiple industries) 5 - 10 倍(强耦合,可能引发系统性经济停摆) / 5 - 10 times (Strong coupling, may trigger a systemic economic shutdown) 10 倍以上(社会运行面临瘫痪) / Over 10 times (Social operations facing paralysis)
33. 排除特定高研发投入供应商后,您预估欧洲该行业的技术代差或研发停滞时间? / After excluding specific suppliers with high R&D investment, what is your estimate for the technological generational gap or R&D stagnation time in this industry in Europe? 几乎无影响(本土研发可立即填补) / Almost no impact (Local R&D can immediately fill the gap) 1 - 2 年(技术更迭节奏放缓) / 1 - 2 years (Pace of technological iteration slows down) 3 - 5 年(关键技术如 6G 或新型储能落后于全球主流) / 3 - 5 years (Key technologies like 6G or new energy storage lag behind the global mainstream) 存在根本性代差(本土生态在可见未来内无法追赶) / Fundamental generational gap exists (Local ecosystem cannot catch up in the foreseeable future)
34. 若相关企业被迫裁员或撤出,受影响的本地员工转岗或领取救济的压力如何? / If relevant enterprises are forced to lay off employees or withdraw, what is the pressure regarding job transitions or claiming relief for affected local employees? 极低(人才紧缺,市场可瞬间消化) / Extremely low (talent shortage, the market can instantly absorb them) 中度(需要 6 - 12 个月的政府培训与资金支持) / Moderate (requires 6-12 months of government training and financial support) 严重(造成结构性失业,地方财政救助负担显著增加) / Severe (causes structural unemployment, significantly increasing local financial relief burdens)
35. 由于设备替换导致的交期延误,对欧盟 2030 绿色转型目标的威胁程度? / To what extent do delivery delays caused by equipment replacement threaten the EU's 2030 green transition targets? 几乎无威胁 / Almost no threat 轻微拖延(可通过后期加速追回) / Slight delay (can be recovered through later acceleration) 严重阻碍(可能导致阶段性碳中和目标无法按时完成) / Severe hindrance (may lead to the failure to complete phased carbon neutrality targets on time)
36. 由于强制剥离现有合法合同,您认为欧资企业面临国际仲裁或违约索赔并败诉的概率? / Given the forced divestment of existing legal contracts, what do you think is the probability that EU-funded enterprises will face international arbitration or breach of contract claims and lose the case? 10% 以下(法案具有强豁免力) / Under 10% (The act has strong exemption power) 30% - 50%(存在显著法律争议) / 30% - 50% (Significant legal disputes exist) 51% 以上(大概率需要支付巨额违约赔偿) / 51% and above (High probability of needing to pay huge breach of contract damages)
37. 该单边政策引发他国采取同等力度贸易反制的可能性? / What is the likelihood that this unilateral policy will trigger trade countermeasures of equal magnitude by other countries? 不可能(属于安全例外) / Impossible (Falls under security exceptions) 有可能(局部领域摩擦增加) / Possible (Friction increases in localized areas) 极有可能(引发大规模贸易战,导致整体 GDP 萎缩) / Highly likely (Triggers a large-scale trade war, leading to overall GDP shrinkage)
38. 在您看来,该法案实施中最大的“社会痛点”是? / In your view, what is the biggest 'social pain point' in the implementation of this act? A.居民电费/网费直接涨价 / A. Direct price increases in residents' electricity/internet bills B.关键基础设施在切换期间的突发断网/断电风险 / B. Risk of sudden internet/power outages for critical infrastructure during the switchover C.欧洲在数字技术领域的全球竞争力下降 / C. Decline in Europe's global competitiveness in digital technology D.国际资本对欧洲营商环境的信心动摇 / D. Shaken confidence of international capital in Europe's business environment E.其他____ / E. Others ____
39. 政策预期:您认为最能平衡“安全”与“经济损失”的方案是? / Policy Expectations: Which proposal do you think best balances 'security' and 'economic loss'? A.“按部就班”:仅对新购设备限制,不回溯强拆存量资产 / A. 'Step-by-step': Restrict only newly purchased equipment, without retroactively forcing the dismantling of existing assets B.“公平补偿”:欧盟设立专项基金,全额补偿企业因强拆产生的坏账 / B. 'Fair compensation': The EU establishes a special fund to fully compensate enterprises for bad debts caused by forced dismantling C“技术中立”:取消供应商国别黑名单,改为基于代码审计的客观审查 / C. 'Technology neutrality': Cancel country-specific supplier blacklists and shift to objective reviews based on code auditing D.其他__________ / D. Others __________
40. 您认为该法案对行业生态、全球供应链体系还有哪些意想不到的挑战或负面外溢风险? / What other unexpected challenges or negative spillover risks do you think this act poses to the industry ecosystem and global supply chain systems?
41. 关于此次供应链重构,您还有哪些核心洞察或关键提醒需要告知政策制定者? / Regarding this supply chain restructuring, what other core insights or key reminders do you have to inform policymakers?