BIBP Platform Effectiveness Survey

Purpose: This survey collects data to evaluate how the Blockchain-enabled IoT-BIM Platform (BIBP) has affected the volume of communications required for carbon data management in the MiC student hostel project. Your responses will be used in research publication. Estimated completion time: 8–12 minutes. All responses are anonymous.
Section A: Respondent Profile
A1. Which of the following best describes your current role?
A2. How many years of experience do you have in fields related to construction, carbon management, digitalization, or sustainability?
A3. What is your level of involvement with the BIBP platform or the MiC project examined in this study?
A4. In which field is your professional experience primarily based in relation to this study?
A5. Before BIBP was implemented, which system(s) did you use to manage carbon data? (Select all that apply)
Section B: Data Collection-Related Communications
The following questions ask about communications you initiated or received specifically to collect raw carbon data — for example, requesting material quantities from contractors, asking suppliers for emission factor certificates, or following up on site measurement data. Please do NOT include automatic platform notifications or general project coordination messages.
B1. (Before BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week did you send or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
B2. (Before BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week did you make or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
B3. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week do you send or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
B4. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week do you make or receive for carbon data collection purposes?
B5. Which platform features have most reduced your data collection communications? (Select all that apply)
B6. (Optional) What types of data collection communications still remain, and why?
Section C: Carbon Data Compliance-Related Communications
The following questions ask about communications related to verifying the accuracy or compliance of carbon data — for example, responding to auditor queries, resolving discrepancies between platform records and physical measurements, or preparing documentation for regulatory reporting. Please do NOT include initial data collection requests (covered in Section B).
C1. (Before BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week did you send or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
C2. (Before BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week did you make or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
C3. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many emails or instant messages per week do you send or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
C4. (Currently, after BIBP) approximately how many phone calls per week do you make or receive related to carbon data compliance or verification?
C5. Which platform features have most reduced your compliance-related communications? (Select all that apply)
C6. (Optional) What types of compliance communications still remain, and why?
Section D: Overall Perception
Please rate your level of agreement with each statement below.
D1. BIBP has reduced my need to contact others to obtain carbon data.
D2. Since using BIBP, I encounter fewer disputes about the accuracy of carbon data.
D3. The blockchain audit trail reduces the number of follow-up queries from auditors or regulators.
D4. Overall, BIBP has noticeably reduced the communication workload associated with carbon data management.
更多问卷 复制此问卷