Patterns of Generative AI Use Among International Students in English-Medium Instruction Programs at

This anonymous survey investigates the perceptions and use of generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, or similar) among international students enrolled in English-medium instruction (EMI) programs at universities in China. This survey takes about 10-15 minutes to complete. All responses are confidential and used for academic research purposes only. English-Medium Instruction (EMI) means university courses where English is the main language used for teaching and learning academic subjects.
Part A: Demographics & EMI Profile — Section 1: Demographics
1. What is your age group?
2. What is your gender?
3. What is your country?
4. What is your first language ?
5. Which best describes your field of study?
6. What is your current academic level?
7. What is your current year of study within this program?
8. How long have you been studying in China?
9. EMI exposure: How many of your courses at your Chinese university are taught in English?
10. Have you attended any English language support at your university (for example, an academic English or writing center)?
11. What is your current overall English proficiency level?
12. Have you taken a standardized English proficiency test (IELTS, TOEFL, or an equivalent)?
13. If yes: Which test, and what was your most recent overall score/band? (e.g., IELTS 6.5, TOEFL iBT 90)
14. What is your current Chinese (Mandarin) proficiency level?
Part B: GenAI Usage Characteristics — Section 2: GenAI Usage
15. Have you ever used Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini) for your studies?
16. On average, how many hours per week do you use GenAI tools for your studies?
17. How many months have you been using GenAI tools?
18. How would you rate your overall skill and confidence in using GenAI tools for your studies (e.g., writing effective prompts, evaluating and checking AI-generated output)?
19. Which is your primary GenAI tools for your EMI studies?
20. Do you need a VPN or similar tool to access your preferred GenAI tool while in China?
21. What are your top 3 functions of GenAI in your EMI studies?
22. Reasons for using GenAI tools in your studies (select all that apply)
Part C: GenAI Engagement Patterns — Section 3: GenAI Usage Patterns (Complementary, Substitutive, Hybrid). For the next questions: In your EMI classes or studies, how much do you agree? Response scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
23. Complementary Use (GenAI supports your effort)
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Disagree
  • Neutral
  • Agree
  • Strongly Agree
I use GenAI tools to check my grammar, spelling, or vocabulary after I have written my own text.
I use GenAI tools to clarify concepts I do not fully understand from lectures or readings.
I use GenAI tools to simplify complex topics so that I can understand them better.
Using GenAI tools helps me improve the quality of my assignments.
I use GenAI tools to check facts or verify information while working independently.
24. Substitutive Engagement
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Disagree
  • Neutral
  • Agree
  • Strongly Agree
I let GenAI tools produce answers that I submit with only minor changes.
I sometimes rely on GenAI tools instead of reading the required course materials.
I use GenAI tools to complete tasks I find too difficult to do on my own, and I submit the output with little or no changes of my own.
For some assignments, I mostly copy and paste text generated by GenAI tools.
25. Hybrid Engagement with GenAI
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Disagree
  • Neutral
  • Agree
  • Strongly Agree
I often ask GenAI tools to write an initial draft and then rewrite or reorganise it in my own words.
I mix my own writing with GenAI-generated text in the same assignment.
I use GenAI tools to generate examples or paragraphs that I adapt and integrate into my work.
When I am unsure, I compare my own answer with a GenAI tool's answer and combine elements of both.
I alternate between writing some sections of an assignment myself and having GenAI write other sections, then combine and edit them into one piece.
I use GenAI tools to generate initial ideas or outlines, and then I write the final text myself, incorporating and adapting the AI-generated content.
26. Please select "Strongly Disagree" for this statement.
Part D: EMI Success and Coping — Section 4: Perceived Success in Courses Taught in English (EMI). Response scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
27. Perceived Success in Courses Taught in English (EMI)
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Disagree
  • Neutral
  • Agree
  • Strongly Agree
I feel confident that I can succeed in courses taught in English.
I can follow lectures delivered in English well enough to learn the content.
I can pass exams in courses taught in English without relying too much on others.
Overall, I am satisfied with my performance in courses taught in English.
Section 5: Role of GenAI in Coping with EMI and Studying in China. Response scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
28. Role of GenAI in Coping with EMI and Studying in China
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Disagree
  • Neutral
  • Agree
  • Strongly Agree
GenAI tools (such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, or others) help me cope with the difficulty of studying through English.
GenAI tools make courses taught in English more manageable for me.
Without GenAI tools, I would struggle more in courses taught in English.
GenAI tools help me manage everyday life and study tasks in China, even though I have little or no knowledge of Mandarin.
更多问卷 复制此问卷